Transmission · Belt reduction

GT2 belt drive, 20T → 60T

The lightest and cheapest way to get a 3:1 reduction. Zero backlash when tensioned, and it isolates shock loads — but it stretches and it will not hold a static torque without tension.

$15 indicative generic Belt reduction

The role it plays

Transmission trades speed for torque between the motor and the load. Every option sits on three axes: ratio, backlash and stiffness. Low ratio with a good encoder is how quasi-direct-drive works; high ratio buys torque but hides the load behind compliance and friction. Pick the ratio from the torque budget first, then the technology that hits it.

Typical use: 3D printer axes, lightweight arm links, quadrupeds.

What the numbers actually mean

The headline figure is 3:1 (20T driver, 60T driven) (ratio), with GT2, 2 mm as the next most load-bearing number (pitch). At $15 in the transmission tier it sits cheap enough to prototype with and replace without regret, which is the correct way to learn a new subsystem.

GotchaPut the reduction at the joint, not at the motor — a belt carrying a whole arm's torque will deflect visibly.

How it compares

Same subsystem, closest alternatives. The primary spec column is usually the one that decides it.

PartPricePrimary specSecond spec
GT2 belt drive, 20T → 60TBelt reduction $15 3:1 (20T driver, 60T driven) GT2, 2 mm
Harmonic Drive CSF-14-100Strain-wave reducer $1.2k 100:1 < 1 arcmin
Planetary gearbox, NEMA 17, 27:1Planetary reducer $25 27:1 ~1 – 3° (typical cheap unit)
T8 lead screw, 8 mm, 2 mm leadLinear conversion $12 2 mm / rev up to 500 mm typical
Printed cycloidal reducer3D-printed reducer $5 20:1 – 40:1 (by design) 0.5 – 2° depending on print quality

Where it shows up

It is a component-level choice rather than a defining part of a named platform — pick it for the subsystem it serves, not to match a reference build.